<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pat Forde talkin&#8217; blogs</title>
	<link>http://www.wearethepostmen.com/2008/01/16/pat-forde-talkin-blogs/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://www.wearethepostmen.com/2008/01/16/pat-forde-talkin-blogs/#comment-63664</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 03:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.wearethepostmen.com/2008/01/16/pat-forde-talkin-blogs/#comment-63664</guid>
		<description>Not sure about wanting to be Bill Simmons. Who is he anyway? I'll do a Google search and feel foolish later. Anyway, drop by my blog for some University of Louisville insights. http://uoflcardgame.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure about wanting to be Bill Simmons. Who is he anyway? I&#8217;ll do a Google search and feel foolish later. Anyway, drop by my blog for some University of Louisville insights. <a href="http://uoflcardgame.com" rel="nofollow">http://uoflcardgame.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PostmanR</title>
		<link>http://www.wearethepostmen.com/2008/01/16/pat-forde-talkin-blogs/#comment-47460</link>
		<dc:creator>PostmanR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.wearethepostmen.com/2008/01/16/pat-forde-talkin-blogs/#comment-47460</guid>
		<description>Flubby:

Point taken.

I guess my overriding thesis here was to address it's OK for MSM to point out some negative aspects of blogs, just as bloggers point out negative aspects of MSM. 

Neither is without flaw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flubby:</p>
<p>Point taken.</p>
<p>I guess my overriding thesis here was to address it&#8217;s OK for MSM to point out some negative aspects of blogs, just as bloggers point out negative aspects of MSM. </p>
<p>Neither is without flaw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flubby</title>
		<link>http://www.wearethepostmen.com/2008/01/16/pat-forde-talkin-blogs/#comment-47453</link>
		<dc:creator>flubby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.wearethepostmen.com/2008/01/16/pat-forde-talkin-blogs/#comment-47453</guid>
		<description>Forde deriding anyone's journalistic integrity is a larf.  Ask him about the Louisville Courier-Journal stripping him of his column over shady practices of his own.  At least with his new gig he doesn't have to pretend to understand horse racing anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forde deriding anyone&#8217;s journalistic integrity is a larf.  Ask him about the Louisville Courier-Journal stripping him of his column over shady practices of his own.  At least with his new gig he doesn&#8217;t have to pretend to understand horse racing anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
