When all else fails, blame the Internet like Lou Holtz

lou_holtz.jpgLook: I understand messages boards and blogs and crazy Internet weirdos have changed the dynamic of the sports coverage landscape. And I also understand some people view this all as a negative — especially those in traditional media roles. I can sympathize with them. In some fashions, I even agree with them. Hell, I write a column every week about this kind of stuff and last week’s exploited this very notion to the nth degree.

That being said: not all blogs and bloggers are bad. Really, it’s true. So when I read what Lou Holtz said this morning on Mike and Mike (via our boy Larry Brown) it’s a tad disheartening.

Former college football coach and current analyst Lou Holtz was a guest on Mike and Mike in the Morning on ESPN Tuesday. Erik Kuselias, who was filling in for Greeny, was ranting about all the college football coaches that resigned were fired the past few weeks. As Kuselias said, and I agree, some of the coaches probably didn’t deserve to be replaced because they did a pretty good job. When Holtz was asked specifically about Arkansas getting rid of Houston Nutt, he answered with a broad generalization:

Kuselias: What do you think about the expectations at a place like Arkansas versus what they’re getting from a coach like Houston Nutt?

Holtz: Well the coaching profession has changed in this respect. It’s no longer just the sportswriters you deal with — you get the internet. The thing about the internet, they can put any rumors there, don’t have to sign the correct name, don’t have to hold an element of truth, not held accountable for. Consequently, there’s just a bunch of things that goes against you.

To be honest, I agree with Holtz here to an extent. It’s all part of the coaching game now. It’s rough, but it is what it is. But I want to believe us as media consumers are smart enough to realize a comment some random dude leaves on a blog post filled with rumor and speculation is just that: rumor and speculation. All the Internet has done has brought rumors that have flown for years via word of mouth to a printed, publicly accessible forum. There are people out there doing awesome work; it’s an exciting time to be a sports blogger. But I’m just worried if people like Holtz and Mike Wilbon — who put the attack on blogs yesterday during his Sean Taylor coverage –  continue to only point out the bad part of blogs and the Internet because they’re too old and near-sighted to see the bigger picture of it all, this is going to become the pervasive general opinion. All the good blogs are doing is going to be lost in the fray.

And that, my friends, just ain’t cool.

2 Responses to “ When all else fails, blame the Internet like Lou Holtz”


  1. ShaneRollins
    November 28, 20071:27 pm

    The reason, I think, that so many in the media love to blast blogs and such is the fact that blogs and bloggers are the ones who are still doing some actual journalism. We actually take the time to research something (least most do) and not just talk out their ass or serve some corporate machine.

    It is real opinion, based with some actual fact and fact checking, not just what the media and corporations want you to think. They can blast us all they want, but Nutt had the best running game in years in the country and he managed to lose three games. That helped him leave, not the scary bloggers.

  2. PostmanE
    November 28, 20071:38 pm

    There are plenty of people doing actual journalism in the MSM, too. Some bloggers are as well. The point is that just as it is with the mainstream media, it’s up to the consumer to discern whether Blog X is worthwhile the same way as has been doing for Columnist X for 200 years. It’s up to each writer to establish trust, regardless of their format, and it’s up to the readership from there.

    R’s point is that a few MSM types have a funny way of pigeonholing all blogs as progenitors of unfounded rumor, which is unfair because while some are, some aren’t. It’s like saying all columnists are asshats because Jay Mariotti is. Simply not the case.

    It’s not Us vs. Them, or it shouldn’t be. It should be about quality product and the freedom of intellectual choice. I’m not sure Lou Holtz is qualified to discuss either.

Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website

Speak your mind