<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lalala - Not listening to you, Ombudsman</title>
	<link>http://www.wearethepostmen.com/2006/06/06/lalala-not-listening-to-you-ombudsman/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 07:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: buy viagra</title>
		<link>http://www.wearethepostmen.com/2006/06/06/lalala-not-listening-to-you-ombudsman/#comment-3877</link>
		<dc:creator>buy viagra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 06:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.wearethepostmen.com/2006/06/06/lalala-not-listening-to-you-ombudsman/#comment-3877</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;buy viagra...&lt;/strong&gt;

buy viagra...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>buy viagra&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>buy viagra&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacy</title>
		<link>http://www.wearethepostmen.com/2006/06/06/lalala-not-listening-to-you-ombudsman/#comment-1744</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.wearethepostmen.com/2006/06/06/lalala-not-listening-to-you-ombudsman/#comment-1744</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Kenny Mayne...&lt;/strong&gt;

Very Interesting Blog! I was wondering if you want to visit the famous WWE Diva Stacy Keibler website!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Kenny Mayne&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Very Interesting Blog! I was wondering if you want to visit the famous WWE Diva Stacy Keibler website!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PostmanE</title>
		<link>http://www.wearethepostmen.com/2006/06/06/lalala-not-listening-to-you-ombudsman/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator>PostmanE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 20:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.wearethepostmen.com/2006/06/06/lalala-not-listening-to-you-ombudsman/#comment-295</guid>
		<description>I would disagree (with the idea that reporting = journalism) simply because "reporting" is a relatively abstract term. For sports reporting, I would argue that any respectable blog does about the same amount of background work that any respectable beat reporter does. The difference is that bloggers don't get to stand around in the locker room/press box, eat free food, and sweatily huddle shoulder to shoulder around athletes as they murmur non-answers into 30 silver digital recorders. 

Of course, there are plenty of idiot bloggers out there (hopefully I'm not self-referencing here) that ruin the rep for those who do intelligent, thoughtful, fact-based sports reporting/commentary. But there are plenty of Jay Marriotti's and Skip Baylesses in the world too, who do little but watch games from home and write 800-word crapfests about what they see. So the idea that newspapers, magazines, and ESPN have some sort of monopoly on journalistic respectablity is inherently false, just as the idea that bloggers run free with little or no rules to guide them. It's a balance of both, and both attitudes permeate both sides of the coin. 

And yes, ESPN does suck. Hard. Both on Roger's Clemens' testicles, and at journalism at large.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would disagree (with the idea that reporting = journalism) simply because &#8220;reporting&#8221; is a relatively abstract term. For sports reporting, I would argue that any respectable blog does about the same amount of background work that any respectable beat reporter does. The difference is that bloggers don&#8217;t get to stand around in the locker room/press box, eat free food, and sweatily huddle shoulder to shoulder around athletes as they murmur non-answers into 30 silver digital recorders. </p>
<p>Of course, there are plenty of idiot bloggers out there (hopefully I&#8217;m not self-referencing here) that ruin the rep for those who do intelligent, thoughtful, fact-based sports reporting/commentary. But there are plenty of Jay Marriotti&#8217;s and Skip Baylesses in the world too, who do little but watch games from home and write 800-word crapfests about what they see. So the idea that newspapers, magazines, and ESPN have some sort of monopoly on journalistic respectablity is inherently false, just as the idea that bloggers run free with little or no rules to guide them. It&#8217;s a balance of both, and both attitudes permeate both sides of the coin. </p>
<p>And yes, ESPN does suck. Hard. Both on Roger&#8217;s Clemens&#8217; testicles, and at journalism at large.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.wearethepostmen.com/2006/06/06/lalala-not-listening-to-you-ombudsman/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 20:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.wearethepostmen.com/2006/06/06/lalala-not-listening-to-you-ombudsman/#comment-294</guid>
		<description>But ESPN still sucks...except for letting me watch Roger Clemens pitch in single A last night...I couldn't have asked for anything more. When his son handed him the ball on the mound, I hugged my Harold Reynolds doll and shed a tear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But ESPN still sucks&#8230;except for letting me watch Roger Clemens pitch in single A last night&#8230;I couldn&#8217;t have asked for anything more. When his son handed him the ball on the mound, I hugged my Harold Reynolds doll and shed a tear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.wearethepostmen.com/2006/06/06/lalala-not-listening-to-you-ombudsman/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 20:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.wearethepostmen.com/2006/06/06/lalala-not-listening-to-you-ombudsman/#comment-293</guid>
		<description>I think it has to do with that whole reporting thing...who knows?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it has to do with that whole reporting thing&#8230;who knows?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PostmanE</title>
		<link>http://www.wearethepostmen.com/2006/06/06/lalala-not-listening-to-you-ombudsman/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>PostmanE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 20:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.wearethepostmen.com/2006/06/06/lalala-not-listening-to-you-ombudsman/#comment-284</guid>
		<description>Not even going to go there, though I love the idea that ESPN and newspapers have a monopoly on journalistic respectability. That seems logical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not even going to go there, though I love the idea that ESPN and newspapers have a monopoly on journalistic respectability. That seems logical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.wearethepostmen.com/2006/06/06/lalala-not-listening-to-you-ombudsman/#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 18:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.wearethepostmen.com/2006/06/06/lalala-not-listening-to-you-ombudsman/#comment-281</guid>
		<description>Respectable journalism? Say the people who have a blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Respectable journalism? Say the people who have a blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Mottram</title>
		<link>http://www.wearethepostmen.com/2006/06/06/lalala-not-listening-to-you-ombudsman/#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Mottram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 17:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.wearethepostmen.com/2006/06/06/lalala-not-listening-to-you-ombudsman/#comment-279</guid>
		<description>Excellent post. I particularly enjoyed the 1984 reference. I often imagine Bristol being much like Oceania.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post. I particularly enjoyed the 1984 reference. I often imagine Bristol being much like Oceania.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
